The statements from the opposing camps are truly spreading terror.
The escalation is frenzied.
The developments in the war involving the United States, Israel, and Iran show that the conflict is no longer limited to isolated strikes or to a “shadow war.”
On the contrary, the events of recent days, the statements of military and political leaders, and the threats to assassinate leaders reveal that the Middle East is on the verge of an unprecedented escalation.
The war rhetoric is reaching a boiling point and global public opinion is extremely worried about the future.
The public statements of the chief of the Israeli army Eyal Zamir, the threats of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) against the Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu, the accusations of the Iranian official Ali Larijani about a possible September 11-type provocation in the United States, as well as the aggressive rhetoric of American President Donald Trump, compose an explosive scene.
Analysts warn that the coming period may prove decisive for whether the conflict will remain limited or evolve into a broader regional, even global, conflict.
Israel’s ultimatum: We will flatten Iran by Passover, April 1
The clearest indication of the impending escalation came from the Chief of the General Staff of Israel, Eyal Zamir.
In statements that caused a sensation, the top military official of Israel revealed that there is a specific timetable for the completion of military operations against Iran.
According to him, Israel aims to have achieved its main strategic objectives by April 1, that is, the eve of Passover.
This specific reference is not accidental.
Military sources in Israel estimate that the next two weeks will constitute the most critical phase of the conflict.
The intensity of air raids, missile attacks, and intelligence operations is expected to increase dramatically, as Israel seeks to complete the operation within this specific time frame.
However, despite the determination shown by the Israeli military leadership, there is growing skepticism regarding the political objective of the conflict, the collapse of the Iranian regime.
Initially, several analysts in Israel considered it likely that the intensity of the military strikes could cause internal destabilization in Iran and lead to regime change in Tehran.
However, the latest assessments show that the political system of Iran appears more resilient than had been predicted.
In operational terms, it is even gaining ground.
This creates a serious strategic question: even if Israel succeeds in significantly striking Iran’s military infrastructure, what will the next day be?
Eyal Zamir
The threats of the Revolutionary Guards and the assassination of Netanyahu
Iran’s response was immediate and extremely aggressive.
The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) issued a statement that is considered one of the harshest heard in recent years.
According to the IRGC, if Benjamin Netanyahu is still alive, Iran will continue to hunt him until it kills him.
This statement constitutes a direct personal threat against the Prime Minister of Israel and shows that the conflict has already moved to a level where political leaders become direct targets.
At the same time, the Revolutionary Guards announced that they carried out a large-scale missile attack against targets in Tel Aviv as well as against three American military bases in the region.
According to the statement, the attacks are part of the “52nd wave” of the operation that Iran calls “True Promise 4.”
The Iranian authorities claim that missiles with mammoth warheads struck industrial facilities in Tel Aviv and caused significant losses.
There are no independent confirmations of the extent of the damage, however, the fact that Iran is now openly speaking about the assassination of political leaders shows that the confrontation has entered a dangerous phase.
Larijani’s accusations about a possible September 11-type provocation
To this already explosive scene was added an even more serious accusation.
Ali Larijani, secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, made a statement that caused an international sensation.
In his post on platform X (social network), Larijani claimed that there is information about a provocation plan in the United States that could resemble the attacks of September 11.
According to him, such an operation could be used to blame Iran and justify a major military invasion.
Larijani stressed that Iran is not at war with the American people and that his country opposes such terrorist plans.
However, he added that Iran is in a state of defense against the aggression of the United States and Israel and that it is ready to respond harshly to any invasion.
The reference to September 11 is particularly weighty politically, as it implies that a major crisis may be used as a pretext for the escalation of the war.
Ali Larijani
The incendiary rhetoric of Donald Trump: I kill mad bastards
Meanwhile, United States President Donald Trump poured even more oil on the fire with a post that caused strong reactions.
Trump stated that the American forces are completely destroying Iran’s military system.
According to him:
1) the Iranian navy has “disappeared”
2) Iran’s air force “no longer exists”
3) the missile systems and drones are “being decimated”
The American President also claimed that the leaders of Iran have “vanished from the face of the earth,” while he stated that the United States has “unlimited firepower and time.”
The most controversial phrase of his statement was when he said that Iran has been killing innocent people all over the world for 47 years and that now, as the 47th President of the United States, he is “killing them.”
He even described the Iranian leadership as a bunch of “mad bastards.”
The Middle East on a trajectory toward generalized conflict - Global concern
The simultaneous escalation on three levels, military, political, and communicational, creates an extremely dangerous environment.
The military operations between Israel and Iran are no longer limited to proxy attacks or covert operations, as was the case for years.
On the contrary, this is a direct confrontation between states with missile attacks, military strikes, and threats to assassinate leaders.
At the same time, the active involvement of the United States means that any further escalation could turn the conflict into a broader war in the Middle East.
The possibility of the involvement of other powers in the region, either directly or through allies, dramatically increases the risk.
Dangerous turning point- The fuse has been lit
The developments show that the conflict between the United States, Israel, and Iran is at a critical turning point.
The timetable announced by Eyal Zamir, the threats of the Revolutionary Guards, the accusations of Ali Larijani, and the aggressive rhetoric of Donald Trump create a dynamic that can easily lead to uncontrolled escalation.
The coming weeks will most likely be decisive for whether the crisis will de-escalate or whether the Middle East will enter a new period of large-scale war.
In any case, the international community is watching with growing concern, as these developments do not affect only the region but may have deep geopolitical consequences for the whole world.
www.bankingnews.gr
Σχόλια αναγνωστών