The Americans, blinded by the falsehoods of the Israelis, fell into an unbelievable trap that turns decisively against the prosperity of the entire West.
Israel, in its ambition to acquire additional territory and expanded influence across the Middle East, enticed the Americans into war with Iran.
Americans and Israelis failed miserably, Iran resisted, and the 17 primary American military installations across the Middle East have been reduced to rubble.
Yet most crucial of all, where the world once enjoyed prosperity and stability, the Americans are losing control of the Strait of Hormuz through which 20% of global petroleum and natural gas flows, alongside losing 12% of maritime transit commerce and energy transiting the Strait of Bab al-Mandab in the Red Sea.
The dramatic developments
Recent developments in Yemen have established equations extending far beyond the borders of the country.
The popular resistance of Yemen, comprising Ansar Allah or the Houthis alongside the national military, by capturing the port of Mocha and the island of Mayun in the Strait of Bab al-Mandab, advancing toward Taiz, routing forces supported by Saudi Arabia, and executing heavy missile and unmanned aerial vehicle strikes in retaliation against Saudi aggression, proved once more that the power equation across Western Asia and the Middle East is no longer dictated exclusively by the designs of external actors.
Under these conditions, the claim by Donald Trump that Ansar Allah or the Houthis contacted him seeking American non-intervention constitutes an attempt to manage a narrative that conceals reality on the ground.
Officials from Yemen have denied this claim, and the prevailing sequence of events indicates, above all else, the mounting operational limitations confronting America.
A defeat still fresh in American memory
Western press reports, including Newsweek, regarding the refusal by Donald Trump of the Saudi request for direct participation in the campaign against Yemen, coupled with dispatches on the deployment of approximately 200 American military advisors to Saudi Arabia to assist in operational planning, outline a dual picture of policy in Washington.
On one hand, the United States does not wish to re-enter the battlefield directly, and on the other, it attempts to oversee part of the military process of its ally via advisory assistance.
This posture demonstrates a great deal.
The experience spanning 2025 to 2026 proved exceptionally expensive for the Americans.
The US blundered again led astray by Israel
The United States, backing the Zionist regime, dispatched its naval fleet into the Red Sea and conducted extensive air strikes against Yemen.
Yet the resistance of Yemen not only held firm, but its persistence inflicted massive costs on the United States, ultimately forcing Donald Trump to declare a unilateral cessation of strikes and emphasize that attacks would not resume.
From this standpoint, present American caution must be interpreted through the lens of that operational setback.
The cost of the war that drained the US military
The most critical aspect of the story remains the condition of American military power and strategic reserves.
In Ireland, Donald Trump attempted to project an impression of absolute supremacy for Washington by making assertions regarding advanced weapons and directed-energy laser systems, yet developments in the war around Hormuz have painted a contrasting operational reality.
Published accounts detailing the steep exhaustion of strategic reserves of America, observations by former CIA director David Petraeus regarding heavy consumption of defensive stockpiles, and statements from commanders of CENTCOM concerning structural damage sustained by American bases across the theater constitute clear indicators of escalating strain on the military power of Washington.
Even the inability to quickly restore former conditions has been highlighted for specific installations, including in Bahrain.
Veteran American generals sound warnings
Concurrently, multiple veteran American generals and defense specialists have issued warnings regarding the capacity of the country to sustain an extended conflict, given that the war with Iran and the war in Ukraine have drained a substantial portion of munitions and logistical support assets of America, requiring years for replenishment.
The status of the USS Abraham Lincoln can also be viewed merely as part of a wider picture of wear and structural duress across the American military apparatus.
Therefore, the hesitation of Donald Trump regarding direct intervention in the war in Yemen must be examined against this baseline reality:
Washington cannot easily enter a war of attrition confronting Iran and Yemen simultaneously, particularly when neither party has exhibited the slightest willingness to capitulate.
US fears over linking Hormuz with the Bab al-Mandab strait
This is not solely a question of military capacity.
The economy of the US is likewise exposed to the fallout of a renewed conflict.
By attempting to symbolically name the straits and project power, Donald Trump may seek to steady financial markets and domestic public perception, yet facts on the ground reflect a different reality.
The Strait of Hormuz, under Iranian control, represents a vital choke point of the global economy, and effective command by the resistance of Yemen over Bab al-Mandab could multiply this geopolitical leverage exponentially.
Connecting the two strategic straits of Hormuz and Bab al-Mandab would entail establishing simultaneous pressure along global energy and commercial arteries.
Any significant change across the operational equations of Bab al-Mandab could drive up maritime transport and energy supply expenditures, subsequently exerting upward pressure on retail prices for crude oil, gasoline, and other commodities.
This development could impose an enormous cost on the administration of Donald Trump and the Republican Party ahead of the congressional midterm elections on November 3, 2026.
From this perspective, the reluctance of Washington to commit directly to the war in Yemen does not represent an abandonment of power politics, but rather an endeavor to prevent the opening of a front whose military repercussions for the United States would be severe and whose economic consequences for American society would be potentially explosive.
The Americans seek to obscure battlefield reality
Meanwhile, the assertion by Donald Trump regarding communications with Yemen, alongside remarks by Secretary of State Marco Rubio concerning the role of Iran in recent advances in Yemen, can be viewed as elements of the campaign by Washington to manage events through information channels.
This narrative attempts to divert analytical focus away from the potency of the resistance toward secondary matters.
The reality remains that even without direct American intervention, the achievements of Yemen convey an unambiguous message to regional allies of Washington: the American defense umbrella no longer provides an absolute guarantee for preserving the desired status quo.
What is transpiring across Yemen today reveals the fragility of American security architectures constructed for allies such as Saudi Arabia, while highlighting the failure of plans designed to degrade the resistance.
For Donald Trump, who maintained that he had crushed Iran and its partners, this reality carries a toll extending far beyond a localized tactical defeat.
Developments in Yemen demonstrate that the ultimate arbiters of strategic equations across Western Asia are not necessarily Washington and the Israeli administration, as the resistance commands the proven capacity to alter the course of events.
This reality perhaps explains why the United States, rather than embracing entry into the war in Yemen, seeks to curate its narrative, because direct intervention risks reviving past setbacks into vivid memories while turning fresh defeats into undeniable facts. In this arena, the short-term smiles of aggressors can yield heavy costs and long-term tears.
www.bankingnews.gr
Σχόλια αναγνωστών