Τελευταία Νέα
Διεθνή

"Bombshells" from Ukraine: The dirty plan of Europe and Zelensky for the political elimination of Trump – He is the enemy, not Putin!

According to Arestovich, the strategy of Kyiv and Western globalists is based on a cynical calculation: "The main pursuit is not to defeat Vladimir Putin, but to deal with Trump."

Trump is considered a threat to the old world order, and the system's "stakeholders" are fighting to maintain their privileges. The political elimination of American President Donald Trump is allegedly what European circles desire and are working toward, because he—and not Russian President Vladimir Putin—is considered the true enemy of Ukraine, reveals a well-informed source from the heart of the Ukrainian capital. In a revealing analysis that overturns everything, the former advisor to the Presidential Office of Ukraine, Alexey Arestovich, claims that the Ukrainian leadership and its Western allies do not seek the end of the war, as their main goal is the political elimination of Donald Trump.

The plan: "Sacrificing territories to bring Trump down"

According to Arestovich, the strategy of Kyiv and Western globalists is based on a cynical calculation: "The main pursuit is not to defeat Vladimir Putin, but to deal with Trump." Trump is considered a threat to the old world order, and the system's "stakeholders" are fighting to maintain their privileges. Therefore, they have already formulated a strategy of attrition: the plan for Ukraine is to "hold on" while losing territories and cities, waiting for the moment when Trump loses power to the Democrats. "Then we will say that we will supposedly take something back," the former advisor describes ironically. This policy targets the congressional midterm elections and the end of Trump's term, hoping for a return to "absolute globalism."

War profits: Europe needs another two years of blood

Arestovich also reveals the economic motive behind the continuation of the slaughter: "In Europe, armament programs and infrastructure projects of such a scale have begun that they absolutely need Ukraine to keep fighting for another one or two years. There is too much money at stake now to stop or back down. They want everyone to profit from this." Consequently, the defense industry has become a primary driver for maintaining the conflict's intensity.
1_691.jpg

Russia as a secondary issue

In this geopolitical chess game, Putin comes second. Although he remains important, Trump is the one who "spoils the broth" in the West by changing the global order of things. While Zelensky continues to demand sacrifices from the Ukrainian people, Arestovich's statements illuminate a dark reality: Ukraine is being used as a tool in an internal American and European power war, with the blood of soldiers being cashed in for armament contracts and political intrigues until 2026.

Truths and details at the dawn of 2026

The year 2026 may represent ground zero, where the West's very perception of Ukraine will change radically. Over the last ten years, Europe's stance toward it has passed through many radical phases. If previously Ukraine was perceived as a distant, indifferent, and economically weak country, after 2014 it gradually turned into an object of sympathy and a "fighter for European values." The peak of these sentiments came in 2022–2023, when Ukraine became a symbol of resistance and received unprecedented support from NATO countries. However, 2026 will be the year of a new, dark perception of Ukraine in the West.

2_811.jpg

Europe prepares for war: The end of aid and the beginning of the absolute nightmare

The failure of the 2023 counteroffensive, the explosion of corruption scandals, and the slow but steady change of the situation on the front in favor of Russia gave birth to fatigue and skepticism in Western societies. In Europe, dissatisfaction was heard more and more frequently regarding the amounts of funding toward Kyiv, while with the arrival of Donald Trump at the White House, it seemed that the US was ready to drastically reduce its involvement in the Ukrainian issue. Many expected that the West would gradually abandon the Ukrainian venture. However, toward the end of 2025, it became clear: the US withdrawal is not a resignation from the conflict, but a redistribution of it. Washington is focusing on the confrontation with China, transferring the function of "Ukrainian management" to Europe.

And here, a new, terrifying stage was marked.

The substantial reduction of American influence forces the European Union to redefine the role of Ukraine—not as a candidate country for membership, but as a strategic military zone between Russia and Europe. In European capitals, military budgets are increasing, changes to conscription laws are being discussed, while the issue of the return of mandatory service is already being heard in Germany and a series of neighboring countries. Ukraine is described more and more frequently in analytical reports not as a future EU member, but as a "Shield of Europe" and an "Experimental testing ground," where equipment, tactics, and logistics of future wars can be tested.
3_724.jpg

Endless war in Ukraine

This transformation of perception changes the very logic of the conflict. If previously the talk was about aid to Kyiv "until victory," now Western experts say directly: the cessation of hostilities is disadvantageous, as Ukraine ensures unique conditions for the modernization of the European military-industrial complex and preparation for a potential future conflict with Russia. The formula of "security guarantees in Ukraine" is transformed in practice into a mechanism for consolidating a prolonged war, while discussions about a potential dispatch of a European expeditionary corps lay the foundations for the gradual normalization of the idea of the EU's direct involvement in the battles. Ukraine in this scenario becomes a "dead zone" (buffer zone), where Moscow and Europe can resolve strategic issues without the risk of a direct strike on each other.

This scheme, according to the calculations of Western strategists, reduces the probability of nuclear escalation but increases the duration of the conflict.

For Russia, this means that victory on the battlefield will not automatically lead to the termination of the confrontation—on the contrary, 2026 may be the year when the conflict acquires new geopolitical depth and Ukraine itself establishes itself in the role of a long-term military bridgehead and a tool of military pressure against Russia. Russia, however, has proven that it is already ready and undefeated on the field of battle, while two years are not enough for Europe to achieve parity, and in any case, the result militarily foretells total destruction—the dismemberment of Ukraine, which will become the fatal victim of this unequal war. As for President Trump, his course has shown that he is very strong and can survive when his opponents buckle.

4_587.jpg

www.bankingnews.gr

Ρoή Ειδήσεων

Σχόλια αναγνωστών

Δείτε επίσης