During a period when geopolitical balances across the broader region face severe testing, deep concern and intense reflection prevail in Tehran regarding the true objectives of the US and Israel. As reported by Iranian news outlets (Tasnim and Fars), behind diplomatic contacts and pretexts lies a complex, multi-layered destabilization blueprint targeting the core of the Iranian state.
Military reality and the rapid US retreat
The onset of this cycle of escalation was marked by the recent 13-day war (which commenced on July 8 following contractual breaches by the American side). According to official statements from Iranian officials, including Behnam Saeedi of the National Security Committee, the US and allies suffered a swift, heavy setback and were forced to retreat after concluding that military power could not achieve their desired outcomes. Iranian forces claim to have achieved complete blindness of US radar systems and communications, inflicting decisive strikes on command centers, satellite networks, Patriot systems, and hangars housing F-15 fighters and MQ-9 drones. Despite censoring efforts from Washington, estimates cite between 100 to 200 US military casualties, an unprecedented tally for such a brief confrontation.
The three-pronged plan: From internal divide to chaos
Precisely because military action failed to deliver expected outcomes for the West, Iran alleges that the US and Israel shifted to a new, more dangerous doctrine of hybrid warfare tactics. This strategy relies on three main pillars:
Pillar 1: Preparing internal divisions
Recent statements by Benjamin Netanyahu — who moved quickly to accuse factions within Iran of sabotaging agreements — constitute a preliminary psychological operation effort. The objective is to distort reality and shift accountability for failing negotiations onto Iranian society itself.
Pillar 2: The false dilemma of "War or Peace"
Political circles and internal mouthpieces attempt to cultivate a climate of defeat, framing resistance as warmongering while promoting a narrative of unconditional surrender terms. The ultimate goal of this artificial division is stirring internal civil unrest, laying the groundwork for a sudden military assault (mirroring past scenarios in Libya and Syria).
Pillar 3: The engineering of false metrics
The most critical element involves actions inside the state apparatus itself. Individuals with questionable security backgrounds are accused of feeding senior leadership manipulated assessments asserting that the population is exhausted and that capitulation to demands is the sole viable path forward.
Tehran's response
Facing this multi-front campaign of subversion, Tehran's official stance remains resolute. Authoritative polling indicates over 70% of citizens mistrust the United States government, with minimal public support for concessions under any pressure. Leadership stresses that proposed peace conditions amount to a sequence of humiliations, encompassing complete nuclear missile disarmament, loss of regional standing, and eventual territorial fragmentation. Under these circumstances, intelligence units and judicial authorities have received strict directives to intensify oversight, identifying and neutralizing every internal Trojan horse threat attempting to aid the US and Israel.
www.bankingnews.gr
Σχόλια αναγνωστών