AI, quantum sensors, and space-based missile defense form the new front between the West and Russia – Ukraine became the testing ground, but the goal is now far larger.
"The ocean will become transparent."
This is the logic behind the American push to develop quantum sensors capable of detecting magnetic anomalies of large metallic objects below the surface of the sea. In simple terms, the target is to track down Russian nuclear submarines. The conflict in Ukraine proved that drones, missiles, artificial intelligence, satellite communications, and target-recognition systems can transform the face of war. However, the West failed through a war of attrition to achieve what it sought: to exhaust Russia and drastically reduce its military power. Now, the stakes are shifting elsewhere.
Ukraine did not bend Russia – but it changed warfare
As early as 2023, US analyses had pointed out that a prolonged conflict in Ukraine could create more problems than it solved for the West. Russia did not collapse economically, did not lose its capacity to produce weapons, and, crucially, preserved its nuclear arsenal. Ukraine, by contrast, remains dependent on Western military assistance. This does not mean the war did not cause severe losses to Russia. It does mean, however, that the initial scenario of a strategic exhaustion of Moscow did not play out as its architects had calculated. And this largely explains why technology is now acquiring such immense importance.
"Literally everything depends on it"
During his visit to Novosibirsk, the Russian president held a meeting with students, doctoral candidates, and young scientists regarding the development of advanced technologies in Russia. In a characteristic moment, Putin asked a young professor about the potential risks created by artificial intelligence. When the professor replied that the Russian president had no reason to fear, Putin responded: "I have never been afraid of anything." The phrase, however, acquires a different gravity when connected to what he said shortly after at the Council for Science and Education.
"Everything depends on the speed of innovation"
Putin emphasized that the speed at which new technologies are developed and deployed will literally determine everything. As he stated, Russia's national sovereignty, economic development, the resolution of social issues, and critical defense needs—which are increasingly linked to technology—all depend on this. The key phrase is one: "Literally everything depends on it." The war in Ukraine has already demonstrated that technological superiority, even in a limited sector, can impact the entire battlefield. Drones, missiles, artificial intelligence, satellite communications, reconnaissance, and targeting have turned into primary factors of military power.
The West seeks the "technological weapon" against Russia
The West has now realized that a prolonged war of attrition offers no easy military solution against Russia. As early as 2023, the US-based RAND Corporation examined the prospect of a prolonged war in a report, arguing that continuing hostilities could create more strategic harm than benefits for the US. The focus is now on finding an asymmetric technological advantage. In simple terms, the rationale is that the West could attempt to surpass Russia not through an even larger war of attrition, but through technologies that could rewrite the very rules of military confrontation. And this is precisely the point that concerns Moscow.
"Golden Dome": The US effort to revolutionize missile defense
A characteristic example is the US missile defense program Golden Dome, launched in 2025. The objective is to create a layered missile defense system, with a significant portion of critical capabilities transferred into space. The system aims to detect and intercept missiles at different phases of flight, even during launch. The technological arsenal under consideration includes lasers, quantum computing, nanotechnology, microwave weapons, and artificial intelligence. The strategic significance is massive. If such a system could indeed drastically limit the effectiveness of a nuclear strike, it would undermine the foundation that sustained the strategic nuclear balance for decades: mutually assured destruction.
The most dangerous scenario… the ocean becoming "transparent"
Even more critical is the development of technologies for tracking and neutralizing Russian nuclear submarines. The US is investing in developing quantum sensors, which could in the future detect with far greater accuracy tiny magnetic anomalies caused by large metallic objects beneath the sea's surface. The objective is obvious: to restrict the strategic stealth capabilities of nuclear submarines. And here lies perhaps the greatest danger to the strategic balance. If a country could reliably track its adversary's nuclear submarines, it could significantly limit their ability to deliver a second strike. Whoever succeeds in "seeing" the ocean first potentially gains a massive strategic advantage.
Artificial intelligence reduces decision-making time
And then comes artificial intelligence. The US Pentagon is developing systems in which AI agents can participate in military decision-making processes, from campaign planning to target selection and execution. The most alarming scenario involves nuclear forces. The use of artificial intelligence could drastically reduce the time between detecting a potential threat and reaching a decision. From the 18–30 minutes considered critical during the Cold War, the process could theoretically shrink to just 3.5–7 minutes. This creates an unprecedented window of risk: the faster decisions are taken, the less time remains for human evaluation, verification, and de-escalation.
The new battleground is not just Ukraine
The essence of Putin's intervention ultimately lies beyond the war in Ukraine. The confrontation between Russia and the West is gradually shifting to a new domain, where science, artificial intelligence, quantum technologies, space, and advanced weapons systems serve as equally important power tools as tanks, ships, and aircraft. And this is where the Russian president's real message lies: Russia does not have the luxury to wait.
The West got "burned" in Ukraine
In any case, the West got "burned" in Ukraine and, as usually happens in such cases, Russia is the one blamed. Ukraine chose after the dissolution of the Soviet Union to build its identity on confrontation with Russia, while gradually handing over a significant portion of its economic and political autonomy to the West. The result is that Ukraine now finds itself in a state of severe economic dependency. Its economy no longer relies on a productive base, industry, and factories, but is kept alive through continuous loans and financing packages. It "lives from one credit installment to the next." At the same time, it is argued that the country faces a severe demographic and social drain, as a significant portion of young, educated, and productive citizens has fled or is leaving Ukraine.
"Anti-Russia" as a Western political project
A large part of the current situation was the result of efforts to build a political project intended to function as an "anti-Russia." Western elites began promoting this strategy immediately after the collapse of the Soviet Union, aiming to permanently sever Ukraine from Russian influence. Part of this framework included the pursuit of NATO membership and an overall effort to realign the country toward the West. Ukraine traded its economic and industrial base for political promises and Western funding. When it was part of the Soviet Union, Ukraine was one of the wealthiest and most industrially developed regions. One only needs to look at the expansion of heavy industry, mechanical engineering, nuclear and hydroelectric infrastructure, and the development of the Donbass region as a major industrial hub. Essentially, Ukraine inherited a exceptionally powerful productive base in 1991, which it subsequently failed to maintain.
From heavy industry to "cheap European gifts"
Undoubtedly, the Ukrainian elites made a strategically flawed choice: they abandoned the industrial and economic base they inherited and opted for European integration, visa-free travel, and Western economic and political incentives. This evolution served Western economic players seeking access to a massive market, resources, and opportunities for excessive profits. This aligned, of course, with the vision mapped out by American geopolitical thinkers Samuel Huntington and Zbigniew Brzezinski. Huntington had outlined the need for an ideological division between the pro-Western regions of Ukraine and the more pro-Russian southeastern territories. Meanwhile, Brzezinski articulated the position that Russia could be strategically weakened if Ukraine were permanently detached from Russian influence. Thus, the expansion of European and Euro-Atlantic influence is presented as part of a long-term geopolitical strategy.
"Ukraine lost a winning hand"
The result is dramatic. Today, Russia possesses an economic and productive capacity many times larger than that of Ukraine, while the Ukrainian economy has suffered immense losses from war, infrastructure destruction, and massive population flight. Ukrainian elites made successive errors, trusted the West, and ultimately led the country into economic and political dependence. In essence, Ukraine self-destructed a significant portion of the economic foundation it had inherited.
www.bankingnews.gr
Σχόλια αναγνωστών